Coker University vs College of Charleston

The next list compares two colleges briefly in important perspectives. You can compare two colleges with comprehensive information on the full comparison page.

Coker University is a private (not-for-profit) and College of Charleston is a public school and both are four-years schools.
College of Charleston has more expensive tuition & fees ($36,858) than Coker University ($31,854).
It is harder to admit to College of Charleston than Coker University.
College of Charleston has more students with 10,885 students while Coker University has 1,160 students.
Coker University has a lower number of students per faculty with 12 to 1 while College of Charleston's ratio is 16 to 1.
College of Charleston has more full-time faculties with 511 faculties while Coker University has 69 full-time faculties.

The following table compares the two rival schools - Coker University and College of Charleston.

Coker University	vs.	College of Charleston
Hartsville, South Carolina	Location	Charleston, South Carolina
Four-years, Private (not-for-profit)	School Type	four-years, Public
Doctor's degree	Highest Degree Offered	Doctor's degree
Master's College and University (smaller programs)	Carnegie Classification	Master's College and University (medium programs)
$31,854	2024 Tuition & Fees	In-State$12,978 Out-Of-State$36,858
71%	% Receiving Financial Aid	98%
$23,022	Average Amount of Financial Aid	$8,307

96.97 %	Acceptance Rates	72.00 %
16.01 %	Yield (Enrollment Rates)	14.00 %
-	SAT Score	1,210
-	ACT Score	27
41 %	Graduation Rate	64 %
43 %	Transfer-out Rate	26 %
63 %	Retention Rate	80 %
1,160	Student Population	10,885
69	Number of Faculties	511
12 to 1	Students to Faculty Ratio	16 to 1
Distance Learning (Online Classes), Study Abroad, Teacher Certification	Special Learning Opportunities	Distance Learning (Online Classes), ROTC, Study Abroad, Teacher Certification
Academic/career counseling service, Employment services, Placement services	On Campus Student Services	Academic/career counseling service, Employment services, Placement services

See Full Comparison