College of Charleston vs Coker University

The next list compares two colleges briefly in important perspectives. You can compare two colleges with comprehensive information on the full comparison page.

College of Charleston is a public and Coker University is a private (not-for-profit) school and both are four-years schools.
College of Charleston has more expensive tuition & fees ($36,858) than Coker University ($31,854).
It is harder to admit to College of Charleston than Coker University.
College of Charleston has more students with 10,885 students while Coker University has 1,160 students.
Coker University has a lower number of students per faculty with 12 to 1 while College of Charleston's ratio is 16 to 1.
College of Charleston has more full-time faculties with 511 faculties while Coker University has 69 full-time faculties.

The following table compares the two rival schools - College of Charleston and Coker University.

College of Charleston	vs.	Coker University
Charleston, South Carolina	Location	Hartsville, South Carolina
Four-years, Public	School Type	four-years, Private (not-for-profit)
Doctor's degree	Highest Degree Offered	Doctor's degree
Master's College and University (medium programs)	Carnegie Classification	Master's College and University (smaller programs)
In-State$12,978 Out-Of-State$36,858	2024 Tuition & Fees	$31,854
98%	% Receiving Financial Aid	71%
$8,307	Average Amount of Financial Aid	$23,022

72.00 %	Acceptance Rates	96.97 %
14.00 %	Yield (Enrollment Rates)	16.01 %
1,210	SAT Score	-
27	ACT Score	-
64 %	Graduation Rate	41 %
26 %	Transfer-out Rate	43 %
80 %	Retention Rate	63 %
10,885	Student Population	1,160
511	Number of Faculties	69
16 to 1	Students to Faculty Ratio	12 to 1
Distance Learning (Online Classes), ROTC, Study Abroad, Teacher Certification	Special Learning Opportunities	Distance Learning (Online Classes), Study Abroad, Teacher Certification
Academic/career counseling service, Employment services, Placement services	On Campus Student Services	Academic/career counseling service, Employment services, Placement services

See Full Comparison