University of Minnesota-Rochester vs MLC

The next list compares two colleges briefly in important perspectives. You can compare two colleges with comprehensive information on the full comparison page.

University of Minnesota-Rochester is a public and MLC is a private (not-for-profit) school and both are four-years schools.
MLC has more expensive tuition & fees ($17,770) than University of Minnesota-Rochester ($14,400).
It is harder to admit to University of Minnesota-Rochester than MLC.
University of Minnesota-Rochester has higher submitted ACT score (25) than MLC (24).
MLC has more students with 880 students while University of Minnesota-Rochester has 630 students.
MLC has a lower number of students per faculty with 9 to 1 while University of Minnesota-Rochester's ratio is 14 to 1.
MLC has more full-time faculties with 83 faculties while University of Minnesota-Rochester has 40 full-time faculties.

The following table compares the two rival schools - University of Minnesota-Rochester and Martin Luther College.

University of Minnesota-Rochester	vs.	MLC
Rochester, Minnesota	Location	New Ulm, Minnesota
Four-years, Public	School Type	four-years, Private (not-for-profit)
Bachelor's degree	Highest Degree Offered	Master's degree
Other health professions school	Carnegie Classification	Other special-focus institution
In-State$14,400 Out-Of-State$14,400	2024 Tuition & Fees	$17,770
76%	% Receiving Financial Aid	83%
$10,973	Average Amount of Financial Aid	$9,742

71.99 %	Acceptance Rates	83.03 %
19.00 %	Yield (Enrollment Rates)	82.87 %
-	SAT Score	1,195
25	ACT Score	24
58 %	Graduation Rate	74 %
37 %	Transfer-out Rate	-
63 %	Retention Rate	86 %
630	Student Population	880
40	Number of Faculties	83
14 to 1	Students to Faculty Ratio	9 to 1
Distance Learning (Online Classes), Study Abroad	Special Learning Opportunities	Distance Learning (Online Classes), Study Abroad, Teacher Certification
Academic/career counseling service, Employment services, Placement services	On Campus Student Services	Academic/career counseling service, Employment services, Placement services

See Full Comparison